Search for: "E v. G"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 5,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
(e) The following are brief descriptions, taken in part from the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism 2015 (June 2016), of some of the conditions in six of the previously designated countries that demonstrate why their nationals continue to present heightened risks to the security of the United States: (i) Iran. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
To be clear, however, we are not supportin/g the bill—we are simply neutral. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:00 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (1): Vincent E. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
Dist., G-05-334, 2006 U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 2:52 am
John G. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
See Sibron v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
You can invert the match to work with lines that don’t match the expression with v: ed> v/re/p I decided I liked this line better. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
See, e. g., Funk Bros. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:12 pm
V. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:15 am
CONCEITO, USO E OBRIGATORIEDADE DA NF-e – Minas Gerais 1. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Section 6(g) Rules Section 6(g) of the original Federal Trade Commission Act (“section 6(g)”) is a very short provision that empowers the FTC to “classify corporations” and also authorizes the Commission “to make rules and regulations for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this subchapter [embodying the statutory authorities bestowed on the FTC]. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:22 pm
That’s the hot, exciting subject of Wednesday’s Nevada federal district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(e) safeguard the property and funds of the Church and Community ...Do you see the utter folly of this charge? [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:15 am
” Boynton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 11:49 pm
In Air Couriers International v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:20 pm
The Appellate Division, First Department, answered this question in the negative in Speranza v Repro Lab Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 01543 (1st Dept. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Those factors include the following:(a) The public policy of this state, as expressed in this act, to encourage the licensure and employment of persons previously convicted of one or more criminal offenses;(b) The specific duties and responsibilities necessarily related to the license or employment sought or held by the person;(c) The bearing, if any, the criminal offense or offenses for which the person was previously convicted will have on his fitness or ability to perform one or more such duties… [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
The case is Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB Case C‑466/12, where a group of journalists writing for the the Göteborgs-Posten newspaper’s website sued Retriever Sverige, a commercial indexing service which provides its clients with links to articles published by other websites. [read post]
