Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 7:39 am
Modules III, V and VI, which address products, contain some common themes. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
” The Court of Appeals recently reiterated that sentiment in Thyroff v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:14 pm
Under Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm
This doctrine, which provides that the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain substantive limits on the power of federal and state governments, has been an important protector of rights since its beginnings in English law. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am
Nelson, Marbury v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
The case is entitled Wingate v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
The Press Gazette has considered whether a cartoon can be defamatory under English law. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
In mid-March, the Court granted certiorari in Negusie v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:33 am
The digest of the bill states: Jury study. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
Nocera doesn’t note that the statute driving this policy dates to at least 1872 and California is unusual among states in its hostility to the clauses. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
In the recent case Hatkoff v. [read post]
