Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 11,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 5:35 am
See, e.g., Totes, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
There is a threshold requirement: in order to be actionable, an interference must attain a certain level of seriousness (McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73[12], Ambrosiadou v Coward [2011] EMLR 21 [28]–[30]). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:54 am
Almosafer Travel and Tourism Company v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:00 am
My English is better than some of the other cleaners, and I believe this is why I was made a supervisor. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
A judgment handed down today by the English High Court will be welcomed by UK data controllers. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 12:41 pm
Static CaravanShires Housing Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am
And some of what Huawei says is really interesting (this post continues below the document): 18-09-28 PanOptis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Mackintosh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:15 am
In Yin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:24 am
The decision of the SFO not to appeal the decision means that English law will be left with a narrow concept of legal advice privilege for the foreseeable future. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:56 am
The case is Madison v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 6:21 am
" Here's the oldest example:1852 V. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Wilson v. [read post]
