Search for: "French v. French" Results 3181 - 3200 of 5,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm by MBettman
On April 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Telus must reimburse $2.6M in texting fees, court rules http://t.co/ib2NBzJwIE -> Ontario court forces BlackBerry executive to work out notice period http://t.co/JLPajwHvGg -> Patent Grant Numbers http://t.co/qxYZo7TZEU -> Patent Myths Corrected http://t.co/L171NcucFm -> QUEBEC COURT CONFIRMS FRENCH LANGUAGE WATCHDOG CANNOT BITE ENGLISH TRADEMARKS http://t.co/XYTYlvcvKD -> Authors Guild v Google Appeal Brief to the Second Circuit https://t.co/QhoNEtPRBw ->… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
Maybe it was to Phaidon's French office that Hi Hotel could have made the photos available, and that the French Phaidon then passed them on to its sister company in Berlin -- in which case the passing of the photos to a third party would have taken place in France, not Germany.Book, also nice ...The trial court upheld Spoering’s claim; Hi Hotel then appealed unsuccessfully. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:26 am
From his tremendous Erasmus experience this Kat recalls that the same principle applies in the lovely jurisdiction of France, where it is for the national judges to determine the content of foreign law in French proceedings. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Kehoe’s Pharmacy Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:04 am by Isobel Williams
The tale about the monkey recovered from a French shipwreck, tried and hanged in Lord Mandelson’s former constituency of Hartlepool during the Napoleonic wars may not be based on fact. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade suggests that the damages of €15,000 shows that French privacy law is not to be feared. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:42 am
It is Case T-315/12 Tubes Radiatori v OHIM (Antrax), available only in French and Italian, so the following is based on a machine translation (please treat that as a health warning).Tubes' designTubes held a registered community design (RCD) for the radiator design below (a design for a “heater for heating”, says my translation. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]