Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3181 - 3200 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 3:06 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The plaintiff argued that she had never agreed to this, and sued in Germany. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Elizabeth Samson
”) International occupation law determines the exercise of authority in a territory by combining three requirements for “effective control” (a term of art with no definite source in international law): the territory is “actually placed under the authority of the hostile army[,]” and “authority has been established and can be exercised” (Hague Regulations, Art. 42); the state in power “exercises the functions of government in such territory”… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:59 am
Talmon (Univ. of Bonn - Law) has posted Günter Grass und das Völkerrecht (Günter Grass and Public International Law). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:17 pm
The beard in question belongs to one V. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm by Margaret Wood
Yet their own authors faithfully affirm/ That the land Salic is in Germany,/ Between the floods of Saale and Elbe. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm by Rick
” Who knew that Americans would set a standard for conformity to following orders that would shame even Germany? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
In Germany the question is a live one -- and if you can't tell your Überwachungsvorrichtung from your Crimpwerkzeug you might be in trouble, as Michael Thesen explains on PatLit here. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
If Germany Had the Death Penalty: a Thought Experiment April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Jillian A. Centanni
In determining that the source code did not constitute stolen “goods” within the statutory definition, the Second Circuit joined several other circuits in relying on Dowling v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by Lorraine Fleck
10 Ways to Protect Your Intellectual Property http://zite.to/HPZyZt Motorola under pressure in Germany from Microsoft patent on event architecture http://zite.to/HWkyzW Slide decks from both parties layout the evidence | Oracle Vs. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Wessen Jazrawi
For instance, while the political implications of e.g., the M v Germany judgment were recognised in Germany, there was never any question that it would not be implemented. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:20 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Germany: The European Court of Human Rights Takes a Critical... [read post]