Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Does it save the Act from 27th Amendment challenge? [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
Edison Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm
What does this tell us about the scope of the case? [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:19 am
Harris. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court in Imbler v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Harris. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Second, does the right to discriminate extend beyond ordained clergy. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Even in Chapter Two -- where I unapologetically set out the sophisticated constitutional theory advanced in the postwar era by political scientists/philosophers like Willmoore Kendall, Martin Diamond, and Harry V. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
How Does the ATCA Effect U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 8:36 am
In Slaight Communications Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
The difference could not be starker - while truth and safety are irrelevant to the ban itself, the new Guidance is all about safety and truth:FDA does recognize, however, the important public health and policy justification supporting dissemination of truthful and non-misleading [information] on unapproved uses of approved drugs and approved or cleared medical devices to healthcare professionals and healthcare entities. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Attempted larceny does not qualify as a predicate offense for purposes of habitual larceny; habitual felon conviction resting on improper habitual larceny conviction dismissed State v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
