Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 3181 - 3200 of 6,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
At the same time, he sets out to understand what we can learn about these stories regarding questions raised by traditional "legal consciousness" research, including "determining if and how law mattered for those involved in these disputes; how their stories may or may not reproduce, challenge, or amend legal power and state authority; ... and how their conceptions of law affect the ongoing politics of abortion" (p. 111). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
It asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The specific issue before Congress is whether new legislative authorities and funding are needed to address issues related to invasive species and their increasing economic and ecological impacts on such disparate matters as power plant operations, grazing lands, and coral reef fishes. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:35 am by John McFarland
The royalty clause in Heritage  provided that Lessor’s royalty is 1/5 of the market value at the well of the gas so sold or used, provided, however, that there shall be no deductions from the value of the Lessor’s royalty by reason of any required processing, cost of dehydration, compression, transportation or other matter to market such gas. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am by Josh Blackman
Fourteen days after the case was argued, the President said he supported the “sanctity of life,” but “the matter is in the courts, and then we’ll see what happens. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
This approach accords with the view of every Court of Appeals to consider the matter, save the court below. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Whether she actually diverted drugs did not matter as its reasonable suspicion was sufficient to justify terminating her. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:13 am by Scott Bomboy
Many onlookers said the scene was deeply offensive, a sentiment that represented the popular majority’s view on the matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:07 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland), heard 13 May 2015. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:12 am by Benjamin Wittes, Kenneth Anderson
The authors analyze this framework, examining the stresses on it and asking where the administration got matters right and where they were wrong. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
As an initial matter, summary judgment was granted on the employee’s state law age and disability bias claims since the Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama was entitled to sovereign immunity. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:07 am by Mack Sperling
  Motions to strike, under Rule 12(f), are reserved for challenging "any redundant, irrelevant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
In doing so Wright demonstrates just how, in the matter of corporate governance, history can be Americans' best teacher. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 3:41 pm by Jules M. Haas
If you or someone you know has any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at (212) 355-2575 for an initial consultation. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
It did not matter that she was not similarly situated since the reporter contended that his conversation with her was evidence of her discriminatory animus, which was highly relevant to the reporter’s discrimination claim under the cat’s paw theory of liability. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Abercrombie Hijab Case – Denver lawyer Jennifer Gokenbach on her Colorado Employer’s Law Blog The Troublesome Recent FCPA-Related Enforcement Action Involving the 2008 Beijing Olympics and Why It Matters – Ohio attorney Kevin LaCroix of RT ProExec in his blog, The D & O Diary For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:58 pm by Bill Marler
“We take these matters very seriously,” stated Superintendent Darrell Johnson in the letter. [read post]