Search for: "Integrity First Bank" Results 3181 - 3200 of 3,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’ (Excess… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Counterfeiting or forgery of money, bank bills, bonds, documents of credit, seals, stamps, marks, and public and private instruments. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
I merely reflect briefly on what was mostly at the sidelines of the case: the first touches on the concept of plausibility, one that played an important semiotic role, in the construction of a plausible analytical legitimacy to the ICJ's order; the second touches on the presumptions of causation, one that permitted the construction of a sort of brutish and simpleminded ecology of cause and effect; the third touches on the larger structural narrative which constrict the narrative space… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
"Tiber, last of all, beheld her, worn out with weeping and wandering, and reposing her body on his cold banks. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, as to the Equal Protection Clause: Plaintiff claims that Detective Rick's alleged racial bias against her clouded his investigation. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
On May 10, 1999, a savings account was opened at Mobile County Bank in the name of 9 Mill with petitioner, Mr. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  The first option is to do what one does whenever a law has been deemed unconstitutional: Proceed as one would have proceeded, if the law had never been passed in the first place. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:06 am by Matt Osenga
  As a practical business matter, the bill leaves no commercially-feasible grace period, an integral part of U.S. patent law since 1839. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm by Benjamin Wittes
First, there are the regional al-Qaeda affiliates. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
The issues of first impression invariable first arise in the lower courts.The intermediate courts (14 in Texas) may or may not endeavor to fill the void if their published opinions, but their precedents only apply to their own appellate districts, and they may take contradictory positions on the same legal issues. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:33 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
But there’s one thing that I really wanted to talk about first with you and that was your work in creating the code improvement commission GitHub where you posted at Initially the entire official code of Georgia annotated, and as you refer to it in beautiful HTML. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:10 am by david_moore
In designing it, Carl and I were driven first by a desire to ensure the code was not only relatively-remixable but also as modular as possible. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:00 pm
Beijing has made clear that the world's second largest economy cannot spiral into a slump and risk mass layoffs as it tangles with rising debt, cooling domestic demand and an ongoing trade war with the United States. . . .In recent weeks, the government has bombarded the economy with a wave of stimulus measures, from tariff reductions that could help soothe the pain from rising prices, to rate cuts that could fuel more bank lending. . . [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
  But that is a topic for another day.In any case, there is a much more immediate and cogent, though not unrelated, reason why the rate is so high, as explained below, concerning so-called “consumables”.BTW, that 1998 $2.10 rate adjusted to inflation according to the Bank of Canada would now be just under $2.94. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and did not decide that the American Rule is relevant to interpreting the language, but looked at the ordinary usage in 1839 when Congress first required the payment of expenses in such suits, the history and purpose of the statute, and Supreme Court precedent, and concluded that the statute authorized the award of fees because expenses include attorneys’ fees. [read post]