Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 62,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
United States is now available. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm
Update: the Supreme Court is considering the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
I suspect it never enjoyed a United States copyright--which makes it an even more apt hypothetical in the context of Golan.] [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 10:32 am
United States, a federal sentencing decision holding that... [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:46 pm
United States declared that situations in which the state is authorized to... [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:04 pm
United States: Why the Hobbs Act Punishes Coconspirator Extortion (75 Maryland Law Review Endnotes, 2016, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Many have lauded the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:22 pm
United States (Florida Law Review, Vol. 68, 2016 Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:14 am
United States Gets Wrong About Prosecutorial Discretion (Ohio State Law Journal Online, Volume 85 (forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 10:45 am
United States, decided this past term, the Court spoke to the requirements under 18... [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:26 am
United States (2012) and Chamber of... [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
In 1795, they ratified the 11th Amendment, which provides that “[t]he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 10:48 am
Antitrust Issues and Decision This case serves as a critical examination of the standards applied to joint ventures under antitrust law. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm
Bullitt (collectively, the Conservancy) allege that the United States is improperly diverting water from Icicle Creek to the Leavenworth National Fish Hatchery (the Hatchery) and otherwise violating Washington State law. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
Among the cases featured is United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Facts of Janus v AFSCME Under Illinois law, if a majority of the employees in a bargaining unit vote to be represented by a union, that union is designated as the exclusive representative of all the employees, even those who do not join. [read post]
15 May 2008, 6:07 am
Thomas's lawyer, nor the RIAA's team of lawyers, had brought to the Court's attention the controlling opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, in National Car Rental System v. [read post]
