Search for: "Legal Reader"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 46,586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm
[6] And so, the legal test for nominative fair use was born, albeit to mixed reviews among the other circuit courts. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:06 pm
About the Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
I will avoid doing this as I think it would be profoundly boring for the readers of the blog if I were to merely register agreement with the book’s premises and the application of the classical tradition to core questions of public law. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
That means I do not bury the lead; I report the news or the action up front and then let my reader decide whether they want or need additional details. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
The phrase “reason to doubt” is not defined, but most HR and legal experts generally indicate that the employer must have an objective, articulable reason for the doubt. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Likewise, Cox was highly critical of the reasoning and result in Roe, as were Tushnet and Ely.But Tushnet is a founder of “critical legal studies” who doubts that the reasoning in just about any judicial opinion explains or justifies the outcome. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:00 pm
The post U definitely can’t do this. appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:55 am
A federal court has rejected her claim, and she may also be required to pay the Times' legal fees.] [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:06 am
The Government will not, however, introduce a new legal basis explicitly covering scientific research, as it proposed in the original consultation. 5. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:26 am
At the urging of readers, I have adopted a new comment policy, effective immediately. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 3:44 pm
The Current Legal Landscape for Website Accessibility Mr. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
Hopefully, my loyal readers have read these posts carefully and will not be in a situation where they have lost their mechanic’s lien rights. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 7:00 am
Your reader can then become the hero and save the day by supporting your claim. 4. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 12:40 am
A few weeks ago, as also reported by Politico, the Authority accepted legally binding commitments from Google to negotiate licences and disclose information that would serve to determine whether the proposed amounts could be regarded as being fair.Insofar as Germany is concerned, also there the Federal Competition Authority appears keener to look into these issues now (under the old right, the Authority ruled out that Google's refusal to negotiate licences would amount to an abuse of… [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
I’ve also decided to share some of my experiences as a woman of color in the legal industry and what I’ve learned over a decade spent in legal business. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:03 am
Mateja Durovic is a Reader in Contract and Commercial Law, having joined The Dickson Poon School of Law in July 2017. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 12:22 am
It was in between, basically a legal test that also involved a plausibility assessment of the factual allegations (U.S. readers will feel reminded of Twombly).What's interesting here is that Apple's motion apparently backfired. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am
“In the context of Yelp, a reasonable reader would understand that the review at issue here was Defendant Ly’s subjective opinion as a disgruntled customer. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
For two reasons, legal and practical.First, a significant feature of the Circuit City decision was the majority’s reliance on the RLA, passed in 1926, to assist in understanding the FAA’s residual clause. [read post]
