Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 5:30 pm
App. 1983) ( West Headnotes included)A wayward Chevy struck a treeWhose owner sued defendants three.He sued car's owner, driver, too,And insurer for what was dueFor his oak tree that now may bearA lasting need for tender care.The Oakland County Circuit Court,John N. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:05 pm
Your liability insurance policy would cover you in that instance by providing you with an attorney to defend you in that claim and by indemnifying (reimbursing) you for any judgment rendered against you in that case up to your policy limits. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:23 pm
S834aConsumer law -- Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act -- Purchasers of pre-converted condominium units filed suit against developers for declaratory relief under FDUTPA, violations of FDUTPA, fraudulent inducement, and conversion and civil theft, alleging that units were purchased based on representations concerning developing the property into luxury resort and sport training facility by a partnership between developers and seller -- Purchase and sale agreements which contain… [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:18 am
Both Shaid and Arshad provided recorded statements to an investigator for Metropolitan.In October 2006, Metropolitan denied liability coverage to Shaid and Arshad based on the policy's exclusion for use of the insured auto in an "auto business. [read post]
25 May 2009, 6:00 am
Insurance provider; 4. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:43 am
Third, the number of defendants in Pennsylvania malpractice cases does not play a significant role in increasing or decreasing the insurance premiums paid by doctors and hospitals. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:14 am
,(E.D.Mich.)Class Actions - Named plaintiff was not appropriate class representative in action against title insurer to recover overcharges on mortgage rates.A federal district court in Michigan has denied certification of a refinancing homeowner's putative class action against a title insurer which allegedly overcharged on premiums on policies issued to mortgage lenders. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
If you would like to learn more about Labor Law 240, or New York's other construction safety laws, below is a list of the leading interpretive cases from the New York Court of Appeals, with links to each decision. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
Strum is one of many defense attorneys with nursing home clients that have converted each of their facilities into an independent limited liability corporation while at the same time have opted not to carry long-term-care liability insurance so they can't be held accountable for neglect and negligence. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:43 pm
The grounds for liability against Texada and Pacific as Defendants are essentially the same in both actions. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:19 am
Plantiffs commenced this action , each seeking $100,000 in SUM benefits. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
The panel’s sole duty is to express its opinion as to whether or not the evidence supports the conclusion that the defendant or defendants acted or failed to act within the appropriate standard or care or whether there is a material issue of fact, not requiring expert opinion, bearing on liability for consideration by the court. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:29 am
He was unsuccessfully defending himself in a landlord’s dispossessory action. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” The enforcement sweep resulted in charges against more than 400 defendants across the nation and 60 arrests. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:01 pm
Automobiles Key # 251.13Defendant's Chevy struck a tree-there was no liability;the No-Fault Act comes into playas owner and the driver say.barred by the act's immunityno suit in tort will aid the tree.Although the oak's in disarrayNo court can make defendants pay.2. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:19 am
[We'll put aside for this post the fact that, as a practical matter, medical malpractice cases are already typically limited by the size of the defendant's insurance policy; very rarely do plaintiffs ever collect or even attempt to collect amounts over that.] [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:53 am
All the answers were unanimous, though a 5-1 verdict would have been valid (CPLR 4113 [a]), and favored the defendants, evidently exonerating them from liability. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
Some background: Remember that in California, liability for non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering) is "several" (i.e., each defendant pays only for its share), while liability for economic damages is "joint and several" -- the plaintiff can recover all such damages from any defendant held liable, whether the defendant is 100% at fault or 1% or less at fault. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:34 am
The subcontractor’s insurer denied coverage and refused to defend. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:53 am
Insurers view employment claims the same as any other insurance matter by evaluating only the potential for liability and the amount of damages. [read post]
