Search for: "London v. State" Results 3181 - 3200 of 4,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:55 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Murrell & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1367 (03 December 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) (03 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Monte Developments Ltd v Court Management Consultants Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 3071 (Ch) (29 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Gazelle… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by INFORRM
Our trade is disclosure – as I argue in my London Evening Standard column today – and we should revel in the opportunity to increase transparency. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:24 am by Steve Bainbridge
I am reading with great interest Private Ordering and Public Policy: The Paradoxical Foundations of Corporate Contractarianism by Marc Moore of the University College London - Faculty of Laws. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:09 am by sally
Regina (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Inner West London [2010] EWHC 3098 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 305 “A coroner did not have power to receive sensitive evidence relating to the security service in a closed hearing in the absence of properly interested persons and their legal representatives. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Geo Networks Ltd v The Bridgewater Canal Co Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1348 (30 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) K, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3102 (Admin) (29 November 2010) Michael, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3026 (Admin) (05 November 2010) Kownacki, R (on the application of) v District… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:29 pm by Cian Murphy
In Soering v UK, the European Court of Human Rights famously held that the extradition of the applicant from the UK to the US would result in a breach of Article 3. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of New London, and Prof. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am by Veronika Gaertner
Celní úrad Tabor) -  the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The question is whether the information is something which the public ought to know or has a proper interest in knowing (see, for example, London Regional Transport v Mayor of London [2003 ELMR 88 - disclosure legitimate if “the public interest in the free flow of information and ideas will be served by it”). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:48 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Although I knew important at the time, I never imagined quite how significant the case of Doncaster v Coventry City Council, October 2010 would be. [read post]