Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
See today’s In the courts Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011): Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
. ~~~ The State: New York The Case: In re: Ferrel L. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
(So, to the nutbag who refused to cooperate with me in his defense, stating “just do what you attorneys do” while motioning with his hands and dancing a jig, that’s why I called you a nutbag.) [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:18 am
Lord Saville stated that Blair J had given the phrase inherent vice too wide a meaning, a fortuity which was unexceptional or foreseeable was still a fortuity. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
But, as Lord Neuberger pointed out in a speech this week human rights and other aspects of our constitutional tradition can easily become taken for granted, as we become complacent. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Austin v- Metropolitan Police Commissioner was brought by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London in 2001. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
State of U.P., 1962-1 SCR 575; (AIR 1961 SC 1457). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
The test has altered little since the 19th century, when in the 1885 case of Durham v Durham, it was stated: the contract of marriage is a very simple one, which does not require a high degree of intelligence to comprehend. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment This case (see yesterday’s summary) is illustrative of two misconceptions about rights that we are all in thrall to from time to time. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
Lord knows how they find the time…to potentially fall under this definition. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:55 am
” For a more recent affirmation of the principle, see R(Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 65, paras 38-42, per Lord Judge CJ. 20. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
Lord Neuberger stated: “At least on the face of it, there is obvious force in the contention that the public interest would be better served by publication of the fact that the court has granted an injunction to an anonymous well known spor [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Yes the Secretary of State has a power to include other forms of ill-treatment falling short of actual violence within s 177(1), but that had not been done because the SoS already believed that the word bore that wider meaning. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
He held (at paragraph 26) that this approach was wrong, thus overruling the decision in GW v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:09 pm
The decision in Campbell v MGN The facts of Campbell are well known. [read post]
