Search for: "MARK D. LINK" Results 3181 - 3200 of 4,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 5:30 am
I'd also add that the AD&D rider on life insurance policies has never made sense to me, either: dead is dead, regardless of cause. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:13 am by Venkat
As an earlier blog post from Professor Goldman notes, the court there cited to the knowledge and control standard from the Ninth Circuit's Lockheed case, under which a plaintiff was required to prove: that the defendant had knowledge and ‘[d]irect control and monitoring of the instrumentality used by the third party to infringe the plaintiff’s mark'. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm by Falk Metzler
The Board thus found that the claimed invention does not fall under the category of presentation of information within the meaning of Art. 52 (2)d EPC. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 12:17 pm
Would he'd suit those glasses? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
[Please report any broken links to me: jwelch at lalaw dot com.] [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:05 am by aferster
” Topics ranged from green chemistry and sustainability (11 posts), to biodiversity’s links to human health (3 posts), clean air science (20 posts, including several about Air Science 40 activities marking four decades of scientific achievements supporting the Clean Air Act), the U.S.A. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm by Buce
  And I'd mark this up to their credit:   in their private desolation at least they don't seem to have allowed themselves to get spun by a spin doctor. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:54 am by Glenn Reynolds
By weak tea, I mean: Pawlenty didn’t say much at all, and I’d rather have a stand up guy sitting at the Resolute desk. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by Courtney Minick
As I mentioned before, though, I’d love to see external sources cross-linked as well. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am by Kelly
The Copyright police are coming (TorrentFreak) US Trademarks & Domain Names District Court N D Illinois: Google is the senior user of ANDROID mark: Specht v Google (Property, intangible) [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
(Special thanks to a loyal reader for a link to the video.)? [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Condensed summaries of this year’s cases and developments are presented below, organized based upon the major CEQA issues discussed, and linked to the full length articles published earlier this year on our blog. [read post]