Search for: "Matter of John D."
Results 3181 - 3200
of 6,866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
In this Nov. 18, 2003 file photo, John Hinckley Jr. arrives at U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Increasingly, the courts have been challenged to resolve complex disputes arising from new uses of works and other subject matter brought about by innovations in technology. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:45 am
California-based inventor and IP lawyer John Nicholas Gross looked at the 77 "amici" who signed the EFF's computer scientists brief. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:38 am
We’d figured YouTube would get back to them in, like, 10-14 days. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm
Best New Blawg – John Simek’s Your IT Consultant10. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:17 am
"I'd do it again in a minute," Dick Cheney said last weekend. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:30 pm
I suggest having the same Twitter account for personal and professional matters. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:32 pm
Steven D. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:01 am
“This is a matter of official policy, but it is also a matter of our values,” President Michael R. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:09 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
In 1813, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote that the constitutional standard is “circumstances which warrant suspicion” – a relatively unspecific and therefore unhelpful standard. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
What really matters is not what information the government or anybody has about us but what use they make of it. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
This committee has eight Democrats (Chair Dianne Feinstein (CA), John D. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 1:26 pm
Steven D. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:04 am
” For readers who want more on this topic, I’d recommend Mike’s paper (with John McGinnis): The Abstract Meaning Fallacy. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law apply in relation to matters respecting the form of wills, it may at the time of signature, ratification, or accession, declare that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them, and may modify its declaration by submitting another declaration at any time. 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm
If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law apply in relation to matters respecting the form of wills, it may at the time of signature, ratification, or accession, declare that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them, and may modify its declaration by submitting another declaration at any time. 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm
If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law apply in relation to matters respecting the form of wills, it may at the time of signature, ratification, or accession, declare that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them, and may modify its declaration by submitting another declaration at any time. 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:11 pm
First, they matter to people’s reputations. [read post]
