Search for: "Matter of Kennedy" Results 3181 - 3200 of 4,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
Kennedy on that tragic day, November 22, 1963. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:20 am by Bradley Joondeph
Wynne goes a long way towards clarifying these matters, but some importa [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am by Eric Turkewitz
Which wouldn’t be so bad except that only Justice Kennedy seems to have had any private practice experience. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
  If this holding strikes you as both consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act’s goal of promoting arbitration of private disputes as well as precise reading of plain language of the law, then you share the majority view of Justices Scalia, Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, and Thomas. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am by Ronald Mann
This includes all four of the dissenters from Stern, but also Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito, who joined the Court’s opinion in that case. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:20 am by Ronald Mann
Ordinarily, however bizarre the ruling, that would be the end of the matter, because decisions to remand cases to state court are not appealable. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am by Guest Author
  Similarly, President Kennedy objected to legislative language directing his administratio [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Barry Winograd
Criticism of the shadow docket has been made in election disputes, for the “SB 8″ Texas abortion ban, in immigration matters, and in COVID regulation proceedings.The leaked draft opinion in Dobbs, and other leaks about that draft, offer insights into power struggles within the Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
In Kennedy the doctor implanted a pacemaker, but incorrectly placed the lead in the wrong part of the heart. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
So why should the former be a matter of arbitrability properly passed on by the Court, but the latter a matter to be arbitrated (rather than a threshold matter of whether an arbitration referral is (still) appropriate, or has been forfeited by undue delay? [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:28 pm
(B) The government may only discriminate based on the content of speech to the extent that such restrictions make sure that the forum is limited to those speakers or those subject matters for which it was opened. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am by Bob Eisenbach
., at 937, bankruptcy courts hear matters solely on a district court’s reference, §157(a),which the district court may withdraw sua sponte or at the request of a party, §157(d). [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:59 am
Texas, Justice Antonin Scalia suggested, contrary to the disclaimers in Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion for the Court, that the underlining doctrinal logic of the majority's ruling would undermine the right of states to deny the right to marry to same-sex couples. [read post]