Search for: "People v. House"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am
A couple of years prior, in 2011, a Democratic House of Representatives member, Heath Shuler, tried as well to sponsor a bill ending the wait, but his bill also died in committee. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
People who are married typically are not only connected emotionally and legally but financially as well. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
Terry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:45 am
The decision thus potentially aids a significant cohort of people. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:42 am
The practice did not put a disabled person at a disadvantage in comparison with non-disabled people for the simple reason that the practice only applies to disabled people. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
See Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:25 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
He had Internet service but discontinued it the day after Haynes came to his house. [read post]
26 May 2007, 3:22 pm
Cannon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Zang found that advertising that targets people of certain races or ethnicities can be harmful because it exposes marginalized consumers to discriminatory advertising in important areas such as housing, employment, and credit. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm
Some people think the House could have won more help from the courts, but this was pure speculation. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Lexis Nexis, he suggests, and recently V-Lex, appear to be trying to counter this with ever-more news-based products to compete with Thomson Reuters, but have come to this market rather late. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
Lichtenberger, supra.The judge then took up the issue Lichtenberger raised in his motion to suppress, noting that the 4th Amendment “establishes [the] `right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
All it takes the appeals court to disagree with Google's lawyers' and amigos' anti-copyrightability argument is to agree with Google's in-house copyright counsel William Paltry, who advocated that the "appropriate balance" can best be struck with the help of "fair use" and other tools". [read post]
