Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 6,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am
” Item (3) is notable because it vests responsibility for the SEC budget solely with the Chair. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
Some people can just delete them, toss them away like an old rag, but not me. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:23 am
From Martinez v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice Roberts'… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
He also claimed that leaflets published and distributed by police on 16 August 2010 which again contained CCTV images of young people involved in rioting identified the appellant”. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
What gains are made by adopting language still used to persecute vulnerable people globally? [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in First Church of Cannabis, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Evans, Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Thus, effectively due solely to the weakness of the Association’s actual confusion showing, the court says the trademark owner didn’t show a substantial likelihood of success. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:01 am
Hughes alleged that she had to defend herself and that multiple responses indicated that people believed the information disseminated by the Sheriff's Department. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
Now that the ACLU has helped win the freedom to marry nationwide through Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
” As requested, people did voice their views to the judges. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
The majority held that Article 8 was not engaged, since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy (“REP”) which was the sole, objective criterion. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:01 am
Carroll v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
The majority held that Article 8 was not engaged, since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy (“REP”) which was the sole, objective criterion. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
The case went to trial solely on the issue of damages. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
(e) He corruptly sells privileged access to himself to a select group which included business people and business lobbyists in return for donations to the Liberal Party. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
Therefore, focusing solely on the circumstances of the employee’s termination, it found little support for an inference of discrimination by the decisionmakers. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
Our opinion rests solely on the Oklahoma Constitution with no regard for federal jurisprudence. [read post]