Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
Superior Court (Schwarzenegger) (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 14 ), and also failed to qualify initiatives that would would repeal the law. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:13 am
He explained many levels of infringement from the top end criminal counterfeiting syndicates to the middle ground people who did it to harm the recording industry but made no money, down to the people like Joel who made no money and had no intention of hurting the recording industry.He explained that this was a civil case and the first time Joel had been to court. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Then, in the 1960s, the Supreme Court awoke Section 1983 from hibernation - in Monroe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
Clarendon I
NEW YORK COUNTYContracts
Court Finds Reasonable Suspicion to Stop Defendant, Probable Cause for Subsequent Arrest
People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Since the Supreme Court handed down Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:01 pm
Some people will say: "But the statute is clear. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am
Schumer is making the case that SS is non-empathetic (even when the parties in question are the survivors of people killed in a plane crash) and, a fortiori, impartial.Next: Washington v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:49 pm
CumminsSpecial to the Law WeeklyDanCummins@comcast.netAlthough a Superior Court panel in Gaudio v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
The Court granted leave to appeal in Superior Hotels, L.L.C. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
Louis Cardinals (a Major League Baseball team) manager Tony La Russa filed the first claim brought against Twitter in the Superior Court of California. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
In mid-June a New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled that Roche could not name new experts in the retrial of Andrew McCarrell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:42 pm
In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:51 am
And it's important to remind people that, especially if (as here) both the trial court and -- even on appeal -- the California Attorney General's Office believe otherwise. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
The insurer moved the court to strike the bad faith count on the basis that the insureds failed to allege facts, rather than mere conclusions, sufficient to support their claim.In deciding the motion to strike, the court looked to the original pleadings filed by the parties in the case of Buckman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:54 am
Hence you lose.The lesson for the day is not to wait to sue dead people. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:53 am
We thus "may presume that the matter was properly before that court" (People v Chad S., 237 AD2d 986, lv denied 90 NY2d 856; see People v Hurd, 12 AD3d 1198, 1199, lv denied 4 NY3d 764).But in both People v Chad S. (237 AD2d 986) and People v Hurd (12 A.D.3d 1198) the Court had found that "the record fails to establish that defendant did not waive a preliminary hearing, that a hearing was not… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:44 pm
The test comes out of a 1990 Superior Court case called Gruber. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
We’ve talked a little about litigation around domain names of famous people. [read post]
