Search for: "R G
v.
G S"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 6,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
In Donawa v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
A lesser standard when compared to a trial’s beyond a reasonable doubt, the court stated that: “Given the sheer number of t-shirts allegedly concealed by defendant, the store employee’s sworn allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes to satisfy the intent and asportation elements of the charged offense, and this even in the absence of specific allegations as to the defendant’s movements or whereabouts in the store (see generally People… [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
Hooks III et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:13 am
Irrespective of the effective date, the R&O’s appearance in the Register establishes the dates for seeking reconsideration or judicial review.Anyone who wants the FCC to reconsider any aspect of the R&O has until Monday, September 15, 2014 to get a petition for reconsideration on file. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
V. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
A recent decision by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to revoke the offer to Steven G. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:52 am
G. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
McGee v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 9:23 pm
Tyco Healthcare Group et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 9:23 pm
Tyco Healthcare et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
Including the important judgments in Chimakure v A-G of Zimbabwe (30 October 2013 and 22 July 2014) on the incompatibility of criminal libel and freedom of expression. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:21 am
In McCormick v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
Ntirenganya recalled someone instructing him to `[g]et on the ground[ ]’ and a female screaming `[s]omebody got a gun. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:53 pm
While R (Rutherford) v SSWP [our report here] had found that payment of DHP was enough to amount to justification in that specific case, the time limited and short duration of DHPs in Mr G’s case “must cause unnecessary distress to Mr and Mrs G in a way that was not the case in Rutherford. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
A federal district court in Michigan accordingly granted summary judgment to the employer (Dillon v Norfolk Southern Railway Co, July 31, 2014, Rosen, G). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:36 am
V. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
I have witnessed them from the beginning of the modern Special Master programs in the 1980’s through the single assignment Special Masters (both mediator and case management/discovery referee) and the dual reference (where the case manager/discovery referee and the mediator are separated) and cases with no outside supervision and the case is handled per the CCP. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:32 am
§ 922(g)(1). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
Robert G. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
Attendance is free for academics, in-house counsel, patent counsel and R&D professionals. [read post]
