Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 3181 - 3200 of 11,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2018, 7:58 pm by Chris Manes
If the entity is a S-corporation, federal rules require a portion of the revenues to be paid to the owner as W-2 compensation in any case, so there’s no issue of improper tax avoidance. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:12 am
Yackee, University of Wisconsin Law School and Jarrod Wong, University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law Wisconsin's Individual-at-Risk Restraining Order: An Analysis of the First Thirty Months by Betsy Abramson, Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging, Marsha Mansfield, University of Wisconsin Law School and Jane A. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm by Bill Marler
As of today at least 68 individuals with bloody diarrhea that MCDPH has been able to interview have either purchased food from or eaten at this particular Federico’s. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In Bishop, this Court upheld a university's "demand[ing]" "the separation of [a professor's] personal views from his professorial duties. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:47 am by Dennis Crouch
In considering the impact of the 1952 and 2011 patent reforms on the judge-made law of exhaustion, the court writes “[w]e presume, from Congress’s refusal to disturb the existing decisional law of this doctrine (which predated the 1952 Act by nearly a century), an implicit authorization to continue applying the doctrine within its familiar boundaries. . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm by Gregg Hollander
If you sustain injuries in a car accident or are injured due to the actions or inactions of another individual, you may be entitled to certain damages. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
Under Oldham’s rule, thousands of individuals who were unlawfully imprisoned because police broke into their homes and found a joint would be stripped of their habeas rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
Further, the courts typically distinguish between a public employee’s exercising his or her right to free speech concerning a matter of public interest in contrast to speech that essentially involves the individuals personal interests. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:23 pm by Jamie Williams
As the Second Circuit recognized last year in rejecting the government’s broad interpretation of the CFAA, “[w]hile the Government might promise that it would not prosecute an individual for checking Facebook at work, we are not at liberty to take prosecutors at their word in such matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:10 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am by Beck, et al.
Well, under the rules, every plaintiff is supposed to file his/her/its lawsuit individually. [read post]