Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 5,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Scott v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:23 am
The case is Harris v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
And, instead focus on some of the good we found in Harris; namely its rejection of our other two least favorite Infuse decisions -- Ramirez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
According to Shane Harris, writing in Foreign Policy: The same day, lawyers for the Electronic Frontier Foundation read Walton’s ruling and wondered why he didn’t acknowledge an order to preserve records that the group had sought in another lawsuit over government surveillance, Jewel v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
Siemenski: we don’t really know because there are too few cases, because of the great imbalance of power between those sending the notices and those receiving them—big corporations v. individual users.Coble for Bridy: should Congress create incentives for voluntary systems to address infringement, and if so what? [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
That to me indicates a state of mind right there that is questionable. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Coakley, and Harris v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:42 am
However, the California Appellate Court, citing an earlier Supreme Court of California decision in Harris v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
Harris, 338 N.C. 211, 223 n.1 (1994); see also United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Nov. 19, 2007), and Harris v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
All of these approaches have encountered contractual roadblocks in court, most prominently in cases such as Zappos and Harris v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
Harris. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:01 am
The power of stingrays, and the lengths to which police will go to conceal their use, are demonstrated by an ongoing case in Florida, State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:11 am
Miller v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm
State which was covered earlier on Grits, overturning the lower court's ruling that a defendant should not have to pay $234 in court costs because Harris County had never issued a written "bill of costs" as required under the statute. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
Harris supports the policy behind the statute, so the disagreement issue is not presented. [read post]
