Search for: "STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION" Results 3181 - 3200 of 5,212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 1:04 am
Board of Education "as insulting rather than honoring my race. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:30 pm
Board of Education â€"- it’s about that important. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:28 pm
Board of Education and related Supreme Court decisons of the 1950s and 1960s have created a well of good will toward the Court among African-Americans, a reservoir that appears deep enough to endure the high court's much more tepid support for black political and legal interests since the 1970s. [read post]
Permissible charges under the 2012 amendments included (i) purchases at charitable events; (ii) discounted parking and mass transit charges; (iii) gym dues; (iv) employer-provided vending machine, cafeteria and pharmacy purchases; (v) tuition and boarding fees for educational institutions; (vi) some child-care expenses; and (vii) payments for certain types of housing provided by non-profit hospitals. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 7:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Tartikov sought a preliminary injunction against the Village and Board of Trustees from enforcing zoning ordinances that prohibit Tartikov from building the Rabbinical College alleging that these ordinances are unlawful under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, the Fair Housing Act and the New York State Constitution. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 8:01 pm by Howard Wasserman
He was lead plaintiff (suing with six other students) in Board of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:15 pm
The Board of Education make arrangements for the telephonic interview, and it also arranged, guided and directly participated in the interview. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party… [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:16 am by AskPat
Board of Education of Topeka (1954) and Plessy v. [read post]