Search for: "See v. See"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 122,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2006, 8:21 am
[See coverage of another case from the November 22nd hand down list.] [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Want to see how to write a persuasive -- and important -- opinion in five double-spaced pages? [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Let me see if I get this right.Brother A shoots Brother B in the home of Mother. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
Noonan -- It is well to recall that the battle over inventorship and thus ownership of CRISPR technology is not limited to the parties in the various interferences surrounding the Doudna and Zhang patents and applications (see "CRISPR Battle Joined Again" and "The CRISPR Chronicles: Enter Toolgen"), as well as remembering that the technology continues to be developed and those developments are or will also be subject to patent protection. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
Munger Tolles, with Gibson Dunn as amici.Not counsel you're used to seeing in criminal cases of this type.Three cheers for pro bono work by big firms.Even when, as here, it's unsuccessful. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:25 pm
This case is unusual if only because you usually don't see someone get sentenced to federal prison for trying to smuggle someone into Mexico.Though if the reason you're trying to smuggle that person into Mexico is because he just shot and killed a police officer in the United States, yeah, that'll get you in trouble for sure. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
I occasionally critique opinions as making little doctrinal sense and/or ignoring the practical realities of justice.Want to see an opinion that exactly the opposite? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:32 am
See Wis. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:48 am
Perhaps a combination of the above.Regardless, today sees yet yet another case from the CNMI that involves an incredibly lengthy (nearly 20 years) sentence for sex trafficking in the CNMI.You'd think that people would get the message by now, right? [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
Particularly since (1) the plaintiff didn't see anything that she slipped upon, (2) there was allegedly a store inspection of that exact area eight minutes before the fall, and (3) the plaintiff was wearing three-to-four inch stiletto heels at the time she fell.In any event, Vons gets summary judgment, and the Court of Appeal affirms. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 1:44 pm
The exact same circumstances that you see a hundred times a day here in California.Except he's sentenced to 29 years to life. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm
That's just what I'd want an officer to do upon seeing a guy passed out in a vehicle with no license plates in a residential neighborhood at 3:00 a.m. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
I listened in on both calls to see what the differences were. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:34 pm
The fundamental issue is that a driver has no idea of parking lot occupancy beyond what he or she can see. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:24 pm
You're thinking about looking through his briefcase to see if you can find any signs of infidelity.Do you really want to know? [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:55 am
We'll now see which alternative the court finds most persuasive. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 2:45 am
Now that the far right has managed to pack the federal courts, it is becoming more and more rare to see a good old-fashioned speech protective case come down from a higher court. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:33 pm
As in, "No, I don't want to see you any more. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
