Search for: "Small v. People" Results 3181 - 3200 of 8,511
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
  It could open the door to discrimination against people of minority faiths, against women, against single parents, and more. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
  It could open the door to discrimination against people of minority faiths, against women, against single parents, and more. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm by Lisa Ouellette
They might discover that immunity is but a small part of a patchwork of complex laws, many of which disadvantage Native peoples. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Jeffrey Carr
This may seem like a small detail, but trucking is a heavily regulated industry. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:03 am by Josh Blackman
Here Levinson and Graber draw direct comparisons between the Jim Crow regime that gave rise to Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
People really have adapted to it and laboratories have found their own solutions. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
And those two things – asking people to believe something they can see isn’t true, and stretching the law beyond what it can reasonably incorporate to justify an end the Court wants to achieve – are troubling precedents for the functioning of the law and our legal system. [read post]