Search for: "Smith v. Smith" Results 3181 - 3200 of 14,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
The rule of law objection to vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: “Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Coincidentally, the Divisional Court in Scottow v CPS has in the last few days issued a judgment in which it re9ferred to “the well-established proposition that free speech encompasses the right to offend, and indeed to abuse another”. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:10 am by Ted Frank
As Professor Burch points out in her post, the pending Smith v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:55 pm by Zachary Alper
This case addresses certain implications of the Laehy-Smith America Invests Act (AIA), namely whether patents with a filing date after March 16, 2013 (pure AIA patents) may be part of an interference proceeding under pre-AIA, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Ben Affleck’s appearance at San Diego Comic Con this past weekend to promote his upcoming film, Batman v. [read post]