Search for: "State v House"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 28,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 11:02 am
See Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 6:47 am
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:07 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has heard a case known as Sackett v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
The Ledbetter Act is named after a losing plaintiff in an oft-criticized Supreme Court case, Ledbetter v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
In that case (Buck v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 12:19 pm
Cieicierska v Brent LBC. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:38 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Gaylor v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Imagine you're in a state, for example, where Section 15 says that you get three years in prison if you burn a house "owned by another person" and Section 22 says that you get two years if you burn a house "owned by the defendant himself. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am
According to the 1850 United States Census, approximately 39% of the United States population, free and slave, lived in Southern states, and that year the South controlled 38% of the seats in the House of Representatives. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:57 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
In Federal Housing Finance Agency v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:18 am
A recent court decision in the matter of Williams v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
The Court cites McCarthy v SoS for Home Department and Abdirahman v SoS for Work and Pensions in support, and explained (politely) a comment made by Kay LJ in Kaczmarek v SoS for Work and Pensions (at [23]) as well as R(Badar) v Ealing LBC (irrelevant as right of residence was not contested). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
The Court cites McCarthy v SoS for Home Department and Abdirahman v SoS for Work and Pensions in support, and explained (politely) a comment made by Kay LJ in Kaczmarek v SoS for Work and Pensions (at [23]) as well as R(Badar) v Ealing LBC (irrelevant as right of residence was not contested). [read post]
