Search for: "State v Smith" Results 3181 - 3200 of 11,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Maynard — and then suggested by the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:26 am by Eric
Helix Health * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn't Infringe or Dilute--Smith v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am by Dan Ernst
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 679. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]