Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 3181 - 3200
of 13,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 10:11 am
Watson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
While its decision was focused on a specific sort of metadata, this conclusion is supported by the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2014 holding in R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.15 [c] [4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14 [2014]; cf. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
But if the 2011 SEC CF Guidance was a wake-up call for public companies, the 2018 SEC Guidance is a resounding fire alarm — and is a must-read for any C-suite executive at a public company. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm
McDermott – that case later became United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. iMove, Inc., No. 17 C 8021, Slip Op. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:10 am
Even the MUSO report, which provides the key data points for the Bell’s coalition’s proposal, plainly states that Canadian piracy rates declined during the study period. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
Amortization of research and experimentation costs Currently, when a company spends money on research or experimentation, it is allowed to deduct the full cost of the expense immediately.[2] This ability of businesses to expense their research and development (R&D) investments has been a part of the federal tax code since at least 1954.[3] However, under TCJA, in tax years after December 31, 2021, companies that invest in research and experimentation will generally be required to deduct… [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:38 am
And, as a side effect, the disturbing Micula story should now come to an end, too.[13] Footnotes [1] ECJ, 3/6/2018, case C-284/16, Slovak Republic v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
The appellate court’s conclusion otherwise was reversed (Alvarado v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:52 am
R. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Patchak v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:54 pm
Smarte Carte, Inc., No. 16 C 03777, 2016 WL 4077108 (N.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:02 am
Today, the CJEU has rendered its judgement in Slovak Republic v Achmea BV (Case C-284/16). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
“What should be covered: The human rights impact assessment should include: (a) review of all the policy options . . .; (b) analysis of how policy changes and proposed budget cuts and other adjustment measures are likely to affect the population,. . .; (c) analysis of the extent to which budget, policy, legislative and other changes may contribute to fulfilling the State’s human rights obligations or potentially undermine them; and (d) a (non-exhaustive) list of… [read post]
