Search for: "State v. Harding" Results 3181 - 3200 of 16,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am by Kristen Clarke and Jon Greenbaum
The court found that racial gerrymandering claims are hard to prove when the defendants claim a partisan motivation: “[Proving racial gerrymandering] is particularly hard to do when the State offers a defense rooted in partisan gerrymandering, as it did here. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 1:11 pm by Colter Paulson
The Sixth Circuit continued its string of Daubert decisions with ASK Chemicals v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:31 am
As detailed in this flyer and full program, an extraordinary group is coming together in early March at Columbia Law School for a symposium entitled Pursuing Racial Fairness in Criminal Justice: Twenty Years After McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Jon Sands
A hard-fought loss by AFPD Doug Beevers of the ED Ca (Sacramento) office.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:27 am
In a parallel universe, I might perhaps have slept through it.It's not a hard case. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Martin Kratz
Cole had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of a school laptop’s hard drive. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:33 pm
In particular, it's not hard to find fun videos on file sharing, privacy and social networking sites (indeed web 2.0 in general) - but I could do with help on less obvious stuff like e-contracting, e-commerce or other aspects of IP?? [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The application (Ravalli County Republican Central Committee v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Texas (state may not prohibit homosexual acts between consenting adults), Mapp v. [read post]