Search for: "State v. L. B. T."
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
Still, the outcome of the Citizens United case might be less sweeping than attorney Theodore B. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am
This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:46 am
State scope of practice limitations. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
United States PTO, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
(Emphasis ours and we address it in dispositive section III-B of this Judgment.) [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly held that the petitioner established his common-law right to the information he sought from the appellant since he pleaded and proved that he had a proper purpose for seeking the information, and a hearing was not required since no substantial question of fact existed as to the petitioner’s good faith and proper purpose (see Matter of Goldstein v Acropolis Gardens Realty Corp., 116 AD3d 776; Matter of Troccoli v L &… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
[20] A study of the effectiveness of the R&D Credit has shown a positive impact on R&D activity and “[t]here is significant evidence that nations and states that adopt an R&D tax credit will experience an increase in R&D investments. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
App. 790, 793 (1)(b), 622 S.E.2d 21 (2005)). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:16 pm
If they were the same thing, then they wouldn't need to be stated separately. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Mangino, David L. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Free Speech L. __ (2023). [2] Winter v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
Just six days after our article, Luis Aguilar, a Commissioner of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), stated very clearly in a speech entitled “Cyber Risks in the Boardroom,”[ii] that, [B]oards must take seriously their responsibility to ensure that management has implemented effective risk management protocols. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Code, §21080(b)(1).) [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Parker v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
” And thank you for stating the obvious. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:41 pm
L. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
L. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
[B.] [read post]
