Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 1:28 am
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
It should rather be to keep looking for and documenting weaknesses of the current system so that tweaks and fixes may do the job while sweeping reforms, however exciting, remain avoidable.ConclusionThese remarks are expressed solely in the spirit of academic debate: as stated above, I think IP Accidents is a masterful achievement. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 7:09 pm
The Quota System requires young people entering the court after 2013 to spend at least 5 years in the positions of judge assistants. [4]Nowadays in Shanghai, if someone wants to become a judge, he needs to study for three years to get a master’s degree in law. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:20 am
The Registrar shall be appointed by the said Minister of Industry, but the Registrar must possess a master’s degree in IP law or International Trade Law, International Economic Law or related field and must have a minimum of 10 years’ experience including experience in the development, implementation, and management of GI at national and international level. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:44 am
LVRC Holdings LCC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The nexus between state, CPC and United Front through the CPPCC, then, serves as the connective tissue between CPC and State constitutions, and between the political authority of the CPC and its exercise through the rule system, it itself has mandated as its own political line. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
Comerford, 49 A.D.2d 818 [1975]; Singer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Heck v. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 7:29 am
When, in 2022, the Supreme Court eviscerated the federal constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 3:09 pm
The Court of Chancery recently barred a Scientific Games Corp. investor from suing ex-Chairman Ron Perelman and his “hand-picked” directors in Delaware because the plaintiff couldn’t prove it was tricked into approving a mandatory forum selection bylaw requiring all corporate governance charges to be tried in Nevada where officers and directors would allegedly be shielded, in Sylebra Capital Partners Master Fund Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:03 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
At the end of his decision, Judge Carney recalled a passage from Berger v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:44 am
In the British Columbia Supreme Court case of Gabriel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:14 am
Tugendhat J gave the reasons for his decision here: Contostavlos v Mendahun [2012] EWHC 850 (QB) (29 March 2012). [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Master of the Rolls published the much anticipated report of the Committee on Superinjunctions, which set out injunction definitions, identified the lack of clarity for media reporting Parliamentary injunction breaches, and made a number of procedural recommendations. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
” The hearings and proceedings in the immigration courts raise one of the highest of stakes, deportation (or as it’s technically termed, removal) from the United States, a process which the Supreme Court in Fong Haw Tan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
” The hearings and proceedings in the immigration courts raise one of the highest of stakes, deportation (or as it’s technically termed, removal) from the United States, a process which the Supreme Court in Fong Haw Tan v. [read post]
