Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 16,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
State of New York, (SD NY, filed 10/14/2020), alleges that the Order was directed at "activities of specific minority religious communities during one of the most important religious holidays in their faith. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 3:11 pm
Public v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:26 am
” “It’s time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 5:20 am
In Shoff v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
I’ve already written here about why I have serious concerns about yet another Republican-appointed Justice; and I have little doubt that a Justice Barrett will solidify a minority-appointed and minority-confirmed Court whose jurisprudence will be deeply problematic. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:30 pm
Castillo v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
Virgin Islands who was a plaintiff in a similar lawsuit, Segovia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:59 pm
Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:44 am
These were not minor points. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
(See Moore v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Complaints took many forms: against the superfluity of electors who lacked any deliberative functions; against the effective nullification (or “wasting”) of minority votes through winner-take-all rules; against the prospect of a contingent election in the House of Representatives, as first dramatized in 1824, which was arguably the one case that best exemplified the framers’ expectations. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:21 pm
Tanzin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:54 pm
Larry Solum has an interesting post on Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm
David Gerald, the President and CEO of the Securities Investor Association Singapore (SIAS), stated that he is not in favour of lawsuits becoming the preferred course of action for aggrieved minority shareholders. [read post]
