Search for: "State v. Price" Results 3181 - 3200 of 11,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 9:18 am by Tom Casagrande
The First Circuit recently held that an insurer was not required to defend and indemnify its insured against claims for misleading product labeling.Accused of deceptive trade practices, false and misleading advertising, and deceptive labeling (the court did not specify whether these were federal and/or state claims), Welch Foods sought defense and indemnity from its insurer.The policy at issue in Welch Foods v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:38 pm
The asking price was $12,000 thought it's unclear from the AP story if that was the final price Dobyns paid for them. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by Adam Baker
Double N also revised its bid but still came in higher than Sureway’s prices. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
Hauser’s survey evidence, the district court stated that “evidence of the price premium over the base price Samsung consumers are willing to pay for the patented features is not the same as evidence that consumers will buy a Samsung phone instead of an App [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:09 pm by Thomas D. Nevins
Judge Posner authored a unanimous opinion at the close of 2010 holding that a denial of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss based on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
The Federal Circuit recently answered this question with a definitive "no" in Zoltek v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
The Federal Circuit recently answered this question with a definitive "no" in Zoltek v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
For any industry where the manufacturers imposes a price differential geographically, overturning Jazz Photo would create a new market of companies importing patented products overseas and reselling them for higher prices in the U.S. [read post]