Search for: "State v. Rowe"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 4:34 pm
” Unlike last Term’s oral argument and opinion announcement in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:07 am
[Herrera v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 3:45 am
A 2012 Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:10 pm
With more than 3,400 prisoners, including 118 foreign nationals, now on death rows, the Court’s role is not likely to diminish in this area over the next several decades, barring a major shift in state laws and public opinion. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:03 am
Freeze v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:11 am
., La Mar v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
Florida, the follow-up case to Atkins v. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
”] From Hines v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
Daniel Sokol is an Honorary Senior Lecturer in Medical Ethics at Imperial College and a pupil barrister at 1 Crown Office Row. [read post]
4 May 2008, 12:56 pm
Do you realize how many death row inmates have been found innocent due to D.N.A.? [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:43 am
In 2011, in Powers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:11 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
This right is of the highest importance, especially when the defendant has ventured to criticise the government of the day, or those who hold authority or power in the state. [read post]
Family law amendments, felony DUI, sentencing, securities fraud and a busy week in the court kitchen
28 Aug 2011, 6:15 pm
Criminal law -- Wiggs v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The first was Freeman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Judge stopped father's evidence, stating that he had failed to show cause to support a change of residence. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
