Search for: "State v. State" Results 3181 - 3200 of 258,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:34 am
SK (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “While the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had power to pronounce an oral decision at the conclusion of a hearing, it was the written determination which constituted the decision. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
For those in DC wanting to see the historic argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
After the leak of the draft opinion, the New York Times opinion editors warned that some states likely would outlaw interracial marriage if Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is argued in a Northern District, Dallas Division case styled, Curtis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm by Eric C. Chaffee
The Supreme Court of the United States has released its opinion in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court rejected the Secretary of State’s arguments based on state immunity and held that whilst there was a long-standing consensus of states in favour of immunity, there had never been sufficient international consensus for an absolute rule in customary international law. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am by Charlotte Bamford
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]