Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 3181 - 3200 of 20,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2025, 5:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
It may have been easy to overlook with all that's going on this week, but on Monday Justice Thomas (joined by Justice Alito) dissented from the denial of certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:11 am
So what was so wrong with the Supreme Court's decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am by SHG
The court validated affirmative action in a foundational decision, Grutter v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:55 pm by Rafael Reyneri
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument (by telephone) in Barr v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Wade, Justice Blackmun incorporated Jacobson into the Court's modern substantive due process framework. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case ended in the Supreme Court on June 3 — without an opinion, and still with no sign of what had prevented action on it. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Harry Blackmun’s colorful majority opinion is still talked about today. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
A decision by the Supreme Court justices on this matter is expected by spring. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Adam Gillette
McLaurin's case also went to the Supreme Court and in McLaurin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
After the rash of articles crowning him as the Court's new swing Justice, you might be surprised that Justice Kennedy still has to write dissents. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am by Florian Mueller
The judges presiding over the two patent appeals divisions of the Dusseldorf Higher Regional Court made statements last year that suggest they may interpret the new injunction statute in a divergent way from the case law of the Federal Court of Justice, against the clear legislative intent. [read post]