Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2012, 9:32 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court recently took up the issue in Estate of Williams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm
The reality is that lawyers who have tried to repair the incompetent delivery of services provided by legal document preparers don’t have to conjure up a parade of horribles to make the case that consumers aren’t being protected “by choice, competition, transparency, and the enforcement of fiduciary relationships. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 1:44 pm
A good follow-up step is to determine whether the transaction qualifies as a consumer transaction. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
See e.g., Rivera v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
See e.g., Rivera v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
The names are changed to protect the parties' privacy. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 4:41 am
According to Deanna, he “was `between myself and any exit other than the windows and he wouldn't let me pass. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 8:18 am
V. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 8:39 am
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
DEP’T OF JUSTICE AND FED. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
& creating hedge fund to limit Madoff exposure suffic. pled wilful blindness to fraud. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsKatz-Wilpon-SDNY-Rakoff-9-27-11.pdf … SDNY: Lack of due diligence in suspicious circs (compared with "red flags") isnt lack of good faith in SIPA §548 cases. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsKatz-Wilpon-SDNY-Rakoff-9-27-11.pdf … SDNY: Madoff ponzi recipients can rebut §548… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
Delsman Satirical Anti-Birther Blog Post Protected by DC's Anti-SLAPP Law--Farah v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:30 am
The case is Williamson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
http://bit.ly/NkiDKN (Andrew MacArthur) Why Keyword Search Won’t Go Away – http://bit.ly/NcEaF6 (Sheila Mackay) You’ve GOT [No] Mail! [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
Lastowka: does nominative use eat up the territory of referential uses? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
The IP rules we think of –consumer search costs, improving quality of goods—don’t fit very well. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:25 am
Again, remember that the survey respondents here aren’t impartial: their job is to protect these large corporations from being held accountable for the damage they cause. [read post]
