Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 23,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2020, 1:15 pm
On September 9, a panel of three administrative patent judges (APJs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a decision denying institution of a petition filed by Apple seeking inter partes review (IPR) proceedings to challenge the validity of a patent owned by Unwired Planet. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:15 am
It was another low patent-filing week at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), with just 12 new petitions (about half of last year’s average); district court filings were average with 47 new filings. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm
Late last week, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued an order denying a motion for recusal and vacatur filed by patent owner Centripetal Networks, which had previously alleged that an administrative patent judge (APJ) on the PTAB panel had an improper financial interest in Cisco. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:15 am
Supreme Court to eliminate the Federal Circuit’s “blocking patent” doctrine. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals finds that the Administrative Procedures Act waives sovereign immunity in the context of copyright rule promulgation; the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:15 pm
To the extent that this bid for Chevron deference is limited to procedural administrative Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) matters such as the one at issue in that case, (an interpretation of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 12:15 pm
Late last week, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued an order denying a motion for recusal and vacatur filed by patent owner Centripetal Networks, which had previously alleged that an administrative patent judge (APJ) on the PTAB panel had an improper financial interest in Cisco. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 am
On Wednesday, July 11th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Apple v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:05 am
On Tuesday, November 27th, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a redacted version of a decision to institute an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding petitioned by Unified Patents to challenge the validity of patent claims that have been asserted in district court against at least one of Unified’s subscribing members. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:24 am
She would later report to the grower's administrators that it happened twice more. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals finds that the Administrative Procedures Act waives sovereign immunity in the context of copyright rule promulgation; the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 8:23 pm
The PTAB is the administrative court of the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
SEC (here), that the agency’s use its in-house Administrative Law Judges, as opposed to its filing of an enforcement action in federal court, is unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:56 am
Landmark cases have been decided on limited trial court records before.The constitutional challenge to the century old exclusive remedy for the injured worker was bolstered by both objective and philosophical concerns. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm
Specifically, before filing a Title VII action in federal court, plaintiffs first must exhaust administrative remedies by filing an administrative charge of discrimination with the EEOC, and then either resolving the claim with the EEOC or obtaining a right-to-sue letter. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:49 pm
She would be the first judge to come directly from a federal trial court, and was supported by Republicans when she was confirmed to the D.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:09 am
The DACA case has been at the Court since November 5, 2018, when the Justice Department appealed three lower federal trial court rulings directly to the Supreme Court without waiting for a three-judge Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel to issue a decision. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 7:27 pm
Analysis: The court began its analysis by stating that a motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens is addressed to the trial court’s sole discretion. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Wilson Issue: Whether federal courts have jurisdiction over False Claims Act suits based on revelations in administrative reports or audits issued by state or local governments, as opposed to the federal government. [read post]
