Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 51,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 7:46 pm
KunYesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Coito v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:50 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent (unreported) case of Fleming v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Changing the method of testing employees for the use of illegal drugs constitutes a “procedure” that is a mandatory subject of collective bargaining City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of New York, Inc., 56 AD3d 70 On August 1, 2005, NYPD unilaterally discontinued using urinalysis as its preferred method of random drug screening of its police personnel in favor or using a type of hair follicle testing known as… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Deck v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
California and the companion case of US v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Mendez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The first, Sonic-Calabasas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
Bank v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Tuffy provides us with a good recent example of this in the case of Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC v Gilead Sciences Inc.A Magical decision? [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am
If the judge finds that is true, given the facts pled in the complaint he/she will dismiss that cause of action. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
But there is another case out there to consider when evaluating ownership of social media accounts: Eagle v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
More interestingly (given the pervasiveness of the use of deemed admissions by debt collectors, albeit here in a case in which PRA is the defendant, rather than the plaintiff), the Magistrate's report and recommendation approvingly cites a case for the proposition that conduct that is unlawful under the FDCPA is also unlawful under TDCA. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
More interestingly (given the pervasiveness of the use of deemed admissions by debt collectors, albeit here in a case in which PRA is the defendant, rather than the plaintiff), the Magistrate's report and recommendation approvingly cites a case for the proposition that conduct that is unlawful under the FDCPA is also unlawful under TDCA. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
In Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk, Supreme Court ducks actual mootness issue raised by Rule 68 offers
26 Apr 2013, 2:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
The court's opinion in that case, Cook v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 11:28 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
