Search for: "United States v. John" Results 3181 - 3200 of 11,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 6:39 am
Federal courts accross the United States are split over this question, but in the Western District of New York, the answer is now "no. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
§1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The reason the Court had occasion to consider whether the Second Bank of the United States was validly chartered by the United States was because if it was (as the Court held it was), then it was an instrumentality of the United States and therefore immune to taxation by a state. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
The Court noted that the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit considered the question in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Lucero; Eugene Volokh] “Innocent man spent months in jail for bringing honey back to United States” [Lynn Bui, Washington Post/MSN] Preakness, Peter Pan Inn, relocating USDA jobs, Baltimore and Abell Foundation in my new Free State Notes roundup; Pushing back against the argument, much circulated lately, that eviction is a major factor in causing poverty [John Eric Humphries, Nicholas Mader, Daniel Tannenbaum, Winnie van Dijk, Cowles Foundation]… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Kyle Duncan
Hodges, fifteen states submitted an amicus brief cautioning that a decision constitutionalizing the issue of same-sex marriage would repudiate the Court’s own recent decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Town of Chester v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
"[T]o be considered documentary,' evidence must be unambiguous and of undisputed authenticity" (Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 86; see Cives Corp. v George A. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
United States District Judge, John Daniel Tinder, concluded that Wrinkles could not demonstrate prejudice because the jury was not aware of the stun belt. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
At this blog and the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr examines the second question presented in United States v. [read post]