Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 3181 - 3200 of 6,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Joy Waltemath
With respect to the conduct by the employee, a hearing officer concluded that there was no indication the alleged threat was disseminated to any eligible voters, and so did not interfere with employees’ exercise of free choice. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Richard L. Hasen
The loosening of campaign finance regulation began with the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v City of Powell, 2016 WL 1165355 (SD OH 3/25/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Due Process, Takings [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am by Amy Howe
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:20 pm by Justin Cosgrove
The Court is considering a plea [JURIST report] by a group in Veasey v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court is considering a plea by a group of voters and officeholders in Texas (Veasey v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
He has lost the preselection vote and claims the newspaper was responsible as he was damaged in the eyes of Christian voters after claiming that he recently left his family home to live with his girlfriend and publishing extracts from a novel he wrote that included graphic sex scenes. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:01 am by Andrew Hamm
On Monday, the state of Texas is due to file its response to a request to block enforcement of its voter ID law (Veasey v. [read post]