Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 3201 - 3220 of 8,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2016, 9:11 am by Amy Howe
The lower courts were also wrong, Trinity Lutheran contends, to the extent that they relied on the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am by SHG
As we made clear in Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:30 pm by Annemarie Bridy
” Of course, the right of consumers to time-shift video programming for personal use has been enshrined in law since Sony v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:23 am by Peter Mahler
The written consent’s operative language stated that the consenting members “hereby consent . . . to any transfer . . . of any direct or indirect interests in the [LLC] to [MFB Realty]. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
•       State control of the fundamental means of production (¶ 63) legitimating/democratizing (¶¶64-65)•       Highest objective: Preserving the state and Revolution (¶¶66; 72)•       Central Planning  is the principal means of socialist development (¶6 [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
Trump as a dangerously unstable figure and a friend of foreign despots like Vladimir V. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 9:51 am by Cannabis Law Group
The reason the outcome, handed down by the Court of Appeal, was no surprise was that it had been filed prior to the California Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in City of Riverside v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:12 pm
State of Gujarat, AIR 1968 Guj 252], and later extended to acts displayed ‘sexual perversity’ [Fazal Rab Shoudhary v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:48 am by James Kachmar
  In Russell Road Food & Beverage, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am by INFORRM
Though CICAD was carrying out its statutory role of battling anti-Semitism, exercising Article 10 rights carries with it the duty to ensure that value judgments have a sufficient factual basis. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The court battles over compelling internet service providers to retain data about their users for law enforcement took another turn this week, with the publication of the Advocate General’s Opinion in the Watson/Tele2 references to the EU Court of Justice. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]