Search for: "Best v. State Bar" Results 3201 - 3220 of 5,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On January, 2016, Judge Strand, the federal district court judge assigned to this case, decided that the Iowa Supreme Court was best positioned to answer the important issues of state law raised by the second category of claims. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:22 pm by NBlack
This very question was at issue in a recent case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Saenz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:58 pm
The latest on this topic comes from a post I made on the gazillionth backup thread I’ve been involved with on various law practice management listserves (in this case from the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Practice411 list), as follows in a thread where a small firm lawyer asked: “What is the best computer backup system and why? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Heidi Henson
The Court also concluded (as a threshold matter) that the Anti-Injunction Act did not bar the suit. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
"It appears that at least some in the Senate also support adding trustees.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 10:05 pm by The Charge
  Through these actions, it may become clear that a guilty plea is not the best alternative for the client and trial or dismissal may be appropriate.When lawyers are "sworn in to the bar", what we swear or affirm is to uphold the constitutions of the nation and our state. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (2014), where Sotomayor was one of only two justices to conclude that a Michigan referendum barring the use of racial preferences in state university admissions is unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
Today, about half of states ban discrimination against members of those groups, but historically they did not, and much of the country remains without state or local laws barring discrimination against LGBT employees.Although the early Title VII decisions uniformly rejected the claim that LGBT discrimination is a form of actionable sex discrimination, court views of sex discrimination evolved and broadened over time. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Harlan, Stevens suggested, would have concluded “that a constitutional amendment that was adopted to protect the states’ right to determine how best to regulate their militias, and which for over 140 years had imposed no impediment to state regulation of firearms, should not be changed by federal judges. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
The first argument, which the majority rejected, is that the business judgment rule bars judicial scrutiny of the board’s discretionary authority to declare dividends. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
The court would like to reiterate that the undue influence concept speaks to the testator's state of mind at the time of the execution of the will. [read post]