Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 10,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States Court for the District of Maryland disagreed. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Taha &Sohaib Khan, Charity Disparity: The Challenge of Applying Religious Law on Zakat in the United States, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018).Michael A. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:10 am
United States. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:20 am
Comparing defendants to Hitler, Stalin, Bill Cosby. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
(See, e.g., Waikiki Marketplace Investment Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The United States was founded on a contradiction: all men are created equal; our Constitution enshrines slavery. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 4:49 am
Trump, was ubiquitous in the national news throughout much of Trump’s administration as President of the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Owners were then stuck with the bill of thousands of dollars to replace [it]. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
The following year the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:51 pm
Specifically, the new section of the law would state: (v) ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
See(2)(A) You Later: Supreme Court Holds that DOJ Has Broad Dismissal Authority Even After Unsealing
21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
Supreme Court, in United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:55 am
So why is Jian Ghomeshi facing criminal charges in Canada while Bill Cosby is unlikely to face charges anywhere in the United States? [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 10:22 am
This appeal was not brought by or against the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
BILL McCOLLUM, ET AL. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v Bush, No C 07-0693)… [read post]
