Search for: "C/T" Results 3201 - 3220 of 50,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: could distinguish university research b/c it’s not products and services. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also b/c design patents are centrally rather than peripherally claimed, as utility patents are. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:30 pm
Ce passage a été effectué en soirée, comme c'est le cas de l'ensemble des bâtiments dits «sensibles » qui traversent la voie d'eau. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 4:13 pm
Burkay, PKK'nın bilinçli oluÅŸturulduÄŸunu ve talepleri terörize ederek sorunun bastırılması için araç haline getirildiÄŸini savundu… [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:35 pm by Buce
J’ai parlé de sa naissance à propos de son père : on y a vu que ce n’est pas un fonds sur lequel il pût bâtir. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:17 am by Michael Geist
She joins the Law Bytes podcast in a personal capacity – she isn’t speaking on anyone’s behalf – to talk about the latest Bill C-18 developments and what measures might help address trust in Canadian media. [read post]
3 May 2025, 8:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[I would say again that the other way to see it is that in NFU/Rogers cases an individualized determination of confusion just doesn’t matter b/c it’s so likely to be wrong—b/c the only direct evidence, surveys or other reports from consumers who have misconceptions about the legal requirements for parody/commentary is not reliable.] [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Dans cette affaire (Cour de cassation, chambre commerciale, pourvoi n ° 08-16433, 7 juillet 2009), les hauts magistrats rappellent ce qu’il est possible ou non de faire sur le fondement de l’article 1843-3 alinéa 5 du Code civil, c’est à dire lorsqu’il n’a pas été… [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:21 pm
The complaint acknowledges that the plaintiffs tried to send 512(c)(3) takedown notices and didn't like the results, but then goes on to explain why sending takedown notices is ultimately futile and shouldn't be necessary. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Malwarebytes, Inc., 946 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2019), held that (c)(2)(B) didn’t apply to “blocking a competitor’s program for anticompetitive reasons,” the parties here aren’t direct competitors. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Well, in examples of association  actions which don't pass "the smell test" we see this:"As part of the membership application process, Individual D provides certain health information to Association C [and is declined coverage]. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:34 am
Since the doc's didn't know, they couldn't inform Mr C, and thus he didn't materially misrepresent (aka "lie") about his health, and so the judge ordered PNL to pony up.Lagniappe: There's also a little-discussed practice called "statement of good health" that is often required when delivering a policy that's been in underwriting a long time. [read post]