Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 3201 - 3220 of 16,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Finally, a quick aside, even though judges bear the primary responsibility for making their dockets transparent, that does not mean the parties should not show more restraint. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Army Initially Pushed to Deny District’s Request for National Guard Before Jan. 6 MSN – Paul Sonne, Peter Hermann, Ellen Nakashima, and Matt Zapotosky (Washington Post) | Published: 3/16/2021 The Army pushed to reject the District of Columbia’s request for a modest National Guard presence ahead of the January 6 rally that led to the Capitol riot, underscoring the reluctance of some at the Pentagon to involve the military in security arrangements that day. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:00 am by zbrown
Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that charging those involved in the Capitol Riot would be his #1 priority. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:00 am by Legal Talk Network
Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that charging those involved in the Capitol Riot would be his #1 priority. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am by Christopher Tyner
The ADA asked the court to further go over with the defendant what it would mean to represent himself. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Marlene Gebauer  1:07 A few years ago, there was a big push in law firms to go sole provider. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
More patents may mean more R&D, but it could also mean patenting every possible innovation on the off chance it will be profitable. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 9:33 pm by Afro Leo
The application was launched claiming infringement under Section 34(1)(a) of the South Africa Trade Marks Act 194 of 1994. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
No, but that hardly means Congress was wrong to enact it. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 8:45 am by Dan Harris
Our China lawyers have been seeing this trick for at least a decade and I used the following examples of this trick: 1. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 8:44 am by Eleonora Rosati
The French court was required to reason along the lines of Article 10 ECHR, probably because of the defensive strategy chosen by Koons and his co-defendants. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am by Brian E. Barreira
… “In determining the meaning of a contractual provision, the court will prefer an interpretation ‘which gives a reasonable, lawful [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Second, a choice of court agreement in favour of another court does not mean the Nigerian court’s jurisdiction no longer exists (without jurisdiction) under the Nigerian constitution, as the Court of Appeal (Hussaini JCA) held in this case. [read post]