Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 3201 - 3220 of 32,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2015, 3:28 pm
On July 8, 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule containing major provisions relating to the Physician Self-Referral Law (i.e., the Stark Law) and its exceptions. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:35 pm
(c) Modification under this section is subject to IC 31-25-4-17(a)(6).As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.8. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:15 pm
Judges tend to prefer that children have the same home base on school nights, unless the parents can agree otherwise.If a serious allegation of say, possible sexual abuse is made, this can lead to the temporary suspension of contact (including with the resident parent) for 1 month, 6 months, 1 year depending on how long it is before the court can spend enough time on the case to reach a view on the likely outcome of a contested hearing or to deal with a contested hearing. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
The DC Circuit concedes at fn. 8 that in fact the detainees are NOT enemy aliens, but that it does not matter anyway - thus standing Eisentrager on its head. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Question Presented in Thryv: Whether 35 U.8.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:39 pm
 They had 8 hours to complete it. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:17 am
The IPKat has often wondered what the European Commission's President, José Manuel Barroso, actually does during the long sunny days of August. [read post]
5 May 2021, 11:04 am by Krzysztof Pacula
  1)    Interplay between the law chosen by the parties and the law that would be applicable in the lack of that choice The first question as phrased by the referring court reads: “does the choice of law applicable to an individual employment contract exclude the application of the law of the country in which the employee has habitually carried out his or her work or does the fact that a choice of law has been made exclude the application of the… [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 9:06 am
Travnik, an Individual; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 2:47 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
The numerous CEQA violations identified by the court are set forth in a Consolidated Ruling on Submitted Matters (Consolidated Ruling) issued January 8, 2018, and attached as Exhibit 1 to the Judgment. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
’ On July 8, King e-mailed Thomson, `I have received a response. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Memo. in Support of Motion to Unseal and Oppose Pseudonym­ity, ECF No. 27-1, at 8-9. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The trial court overruled most of the objections but sustained the Gillespies' objection to the pool supplement.[8] The trial court concluded that the pool supplement was not a business record but indicated that it might be admissible as a public record "[i]f [the Trust] wish[es] to introduce it in a different way. [read post]