Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 3201 - 3220 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Roe v Wade's trimester is one good example, and its stability became an open question after years of apparent precedential force. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
In this sense, Judge Posner believes that parties in fee petitions should not engage in an "elaborate inquiry into the state of mind of the party from whom reimbursement of attorneys' fees is sought. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:30 am by Gene Takagi
With this and the Scalability MacGuffin, the Strategic Plan for Total World Domination is complete! [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:07 am by admin
He does not need to show that it was the sole or the dominant reason. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 am by Nathan Koppel
Historically, they have been dominant in the appellate sphere. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
The resolution of these challenges--internationalization and voluntary GHG regulation (linkage and dominant market actor strategies). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
  The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
More states are expected to introduce taxes on vapor products in 2020. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 held that despite the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, a state law requiring separate railroad cars for blacks and whites was constitutional as long as the cars were physically the same. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The gardener's relatives sue Danielle for wrongful death, claiming her actions created a risk of injury by foreseeably enraging Craig.[5] And a version of this problem arises with the "duty to retreat" that thirteen states still recognize in self-defense cases, and the more general "duty to comply with a negative demand" that seven states still recognize. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
In fact, I can state the unequivocal belief that that day would absolutely never come. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]