Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 3201 - 3220 of 3,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2010, 11:12 am by Charles M. Nathan, Latham & Watkins LLP,
That the investor's relationship to the board could have been ordered differently does not mean the difference should just be ignored. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:32 am by Susan Brenner
Delaware, which brings back to the origins of his case. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by J. Robert Brown
And on this point, Delaware law is clear: Under Blasius, where director conduct is designed to frustrate the outcome of a shareholder vote or impede the shareholder franchise, the business judgment rule does not apply and directors must provide a “compelling justification” for their actions. . . . [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 4:34 am by Broc Romanek
- How Corporate Money Will Reshape Politics What Does Citizens United Mean for Director Elections? [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:13 am by Broc Romanek
Readers may wish to compare the California court's holding with the following observation by Delaware Vice Chancellor Lamb in Latesco v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon v… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:37 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Chief Justice: The top four cases I would select for special mention are the 2005 case in Doe v. [read post]